A go-to-market strategy for B2B SaaS is not a document, it is four decisions that fit together: who you sell to (ICP), why they should care (positioning), where you reach them (channels), and what you do every day for the first 90 days to turn that into booked calls. I have spent 5+ years selling B2B SaaS, closed over €4M in career revenue including single deals above €120K, and co-founded Pink Pineapple. In that time I have watched more good products die from a fuzzy GTM than from a weak feature set. This is the exact framework I walk founders through, minus the consulting fluff.
Most “GTM strategies” I get sent are really a wishlist. Ten channels, three personas, a vague promise to “build brand.” That is not a strategy, that is an excuse to do a little of everything and commit to nothing. A strategy is what you say no to. So let me show you how a go to market strategy consultant actually cuts it down to the parts that print revenue.
Start with ICP, and make it painfully specific
Ideal Customer Profile is where 90% of B2B SaaS founders go wrong, and it is always the same mistake: too broad. “B2B companies with 10 to 500 employees who want to grow” is not an ICP, it is the phone book. A real ICP is narrow enough that when you read it, one specific company pops into your head.
Here is how I get there. Forget who you want to sell to for a second. Look at who already paid you, stayed, and referred someone. Even if that is only four customers, there is a pattern in there. Pull the thread on it:
When I ran GTM for the Venture Challenge program, the ICP was ruthlessly tight: startup teams inside a structured accelerator cohort, ready to commit €5K. Not “startups.” Not “founders who want funding.” That precision is exactly why we pulled 170 qualified leads in 90 days across 25 teams at €5K each. Broad targeting would have buried us in tire-kickers.
Positioning: why you, and why now
Once you know who, you need why. Positioning is the story that makes your ICP feel understood in the first 10 seconds. Get this wrong and even perfect targeting falls flat, because a right-fit prospect reads your homepage, shrugs, and leaves.
The trap here is describing your features instead of their problem. Nobody wakes up wanting “an AI-powered analytics platform.” They wake up wanting to stop getting yelled at in the Monday numbers meeting. Your positioning has to name the pain they actually feel and the outcome they actually want, in their words.
| Element | Feature-led | Outcome-led |
|---|---|---|
| Headline | ”Automated reporting for teams" | "Kill the 6-hour Monday report scramble” |
| Value prop | ”Powerful dashboards and integrations" | "Know your numbers before your boss asks” |
| Proof | ”Trusted by leading companies" | "Cut reporting time from 6 hours to 20 minutes” |
A simple positioning statement I use with founders: “For [ICP] who [trigger/pain], [product] is the [category] that [core outcome], unlike [status quo].” Fill that in with real words your customers use, not marketing words. Then read it out loud to an actual prospect. If they say “yeah, that is exactly it,” you are done. If they tilt their head, you are not.
One more thing on positioning: pick a category the buyer already understands, then win a narrow slice of it. Trying to invent a new category is a luxury for companies with a marketing budget you do not have yet. Anchor to something familiar, then differentiate hard on the one thing you do better than anyone.
Channel selection: pick two, ignore the rest
Now, where do you reach these people. This is where founders melt down, because every guru online swears their channel is the one. LinkedIn. Cold email. SEO. Paid. Communities. Partnerships. You cannot do them all, and you should not try. Early GTM is about finding one or two channels where your specific ICP is reachable and where you can win, then going deep instead of wide.
I score channels on three things: can I reach my ICP there, can I afford to compete there, and does it match my sales motion. A €5K deal can survive high-volume cold outreach. A €120K deal needs relationships, warm intros, and patience, so blasting 500 cold emails a day is the wrong tool. Match the channel to the deal size and the buyer.
Focus beats a scattered presence on six platforms
Long enough to see signal, short enough to cut losses
Bigger deals need warmer, slower channels
Here is the quick logic I use per channel:
- Cold email: best for clear ICPs with findable contact data and deals under roughly €30K. Cheap to test, brutal if your positioning is weak, because a bad message just gets ignored faster at scale.
- LinkedIn (outbound plus content): strong when your buyer is active there and your deals need trust before the call. Slower to warm up, but the reply quality is higher and it compounds.
- Warm intros and partnerships: the highest-converting channel for big deals, full stop. Harder to systematize, so treat it as a deliberate motion, not a lucky accident.
- SEO and content: a long game that pays for years once it works, but it will not fill your pipeline this quarter. Run it in parallel, never as your only bet.
With IKI Health we were disciplined: one primary channel, tight ICP, sharp positioning. That focus is what booked 30+ calls in month one and converted 2 high-ticket deals. Not six channels half-executed, one channel run properly.
The first 90 days: the motion that turns strategy into pipeline
Strategy without a motion is a PDF. The motion is what you actually do, day after day, to convert the three decisions above into booked calls and closed revenue. Here is the 90-day shape I give founders and small sales teams. It is deliberately boring, because boring and consistent beats clever and sporadic every time.
The magic is not in any single step, it is in doing them in order and not skipping the boring middle. Most founders quit outreach on day nine because they got three rejections. Three rejections is not data, it is a Tuesday. The founders who win are the ones still sending consistent, well-targeted messages on day 40 while their competitors have already declared the channel “dead.”
Where founders get stuck, and when to bring in help
Nine times out of ten, a stuck GTM is not a channel problem, it is an ICP or positioning problem wearing a channel costume. Founders come to me convinced cold email “does not work,” and within an hour we find the message was aimed at the wrong person with a feature-led pitch. Fix the target and the message, and the same channel that “failed” starts booking calls.
You can absolutely run this framework yourself, and plenty of founders do. Where an outside set of eyes earns its keep is speed and honesty: cutting the six months of trial and error down to a few weeks, and telling you the uncomfortable truth about your positioning that your team is too close to see. If you want a hand pressure-testing your ICP, sharpening the pitch, and building the 90-day motion, that is exactly what I do on the services side of the house.
Go-to-market is not mystical. It is four decisions made with discipline and executed with a consistency most people cannot stomach. Nail who you sell to, why they buy, where you reach them, and what you do every day, and the pipeline follows. Get sloppy on any one of the four and no clever tactic will save you.
If your product is good but the pipeline is not moving, the fastest fix is usually a sharp outside read on where the framework is breaking. That is what I do. Book a sales audit and let us find the one broken link in your GTM over on the services page, and get your first 90-day motion built properly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a go to market strategy consultant actually do?
A good one does not hand you a 40-slide deck and disappear. They pressure-test your ICP against real deals, sharpen your positioning until a prospect gets it in one sentence, pick the two channels you can actually win, and build the day-by-day motion your team runs. The output is booked calls and closed deals, not a strategy document nobody opens again.
How long before a new GTM strategy shows results?
For B2B SaaS with a reasonable ACV, you should see leading indicators inside 30 days: more relevant replies, better call quality, fewer 'not a fit' rejections. Real pipeline usually shows in 60 to 90 days depending on your sales cycle. If nothing has moved after 90 days of consistent execution, the problem is the strategy, not patience.
Do I need product-market fit before working on GTM?
You need signal, not certainty. If a handful of customers pay you and stick around, you have enough to build a repeatable motion and find the pattern in who buys. If literally nobody has paid yet, GTM will not save you, that is a product and ICP problem first. Most founders who think they lack PMF actually have it, they just cannot describe who it is for.
Want this run on your pipeline?
€500, 90 minutes. Credited against any Build.